![]() ![]() The again, you could argue that it can do that with DoK.īut honestly, I don’t know but I would love to hear what everyone else thinks. For example, if a student has to take the water temperature from a river each day for a month and then construct a graph, this would be classified as a Level 2. So now the question becomes, is one better than the other? I will say this – I do like DoK because it tends to lean to the idea that learning requires all four levels, where is at times with Bloom’s learning can stop at the first level. Now, in comparison, DoK looks like this – Depth of KnowledgeĭOK 1– This chart has a good explanation of the processĭoK 2 – This chart really explains each level. Several of good examples can be found here –īloom’s Taxonomy 1 – a rose wheel for students in older grades.īloom’s Taxonomy 2 – a triangle example for students in younger grades.īloom’s Taxonomy 3 – a chart with the a great list of the verbs for Bloom’s This example came from this blog in a 2009 post and I think it is such a great explanation of the levels of thinking as it provides the students and teachers with a plethora of verbs and activities to use in the classroom. 15x + 14 49 What are fascinating numbers Explain with an appropriate example. Even in Level one activities (such as math facts), expect students to. Also, what are the internal angles of the given polygon Solve the following linear equation for x. With Webbs DoK chart, not only can you figure out how to teach a subject more. Yet, after some time exploring DoK, I began to wonder if it is truly a better way to think about acquisition of knowledge.įor those of you who don’t know or use bloom’s taxonomy, the chart below is a good example of it’s purpose – Bloom’s taxonomy DOK Level 1 Determine the area of the rectangle depicted below. I am without question an educator that has always considered Bloom’s the bible on the ways in which I can challenge not only students but teachers to dig deeper and push harder into learning process. Robert Kaplinsky has put together a Matrix with examples of the Depth of Knowledge levels from elementary & secondary math. Now, I am in no position to say which is better. Depth of Knowledge in Mathematics Depth of Knowledge levels can be very tricky to understand without concrete examples, especially in mathematics. Webb’s analysis of learning presented all of us in the institute with a new way at looking at the ways in which we learn and challenged us to think – Bloom’s Taxonomy or Depth of Knowledge (DoK – for short). Download Now Download to read offline Education This was a 45-minute presentation on Depth of Knowledge to Secondary Principals on as a preview of training to be delivered to Northshore School District teachers. During my summer institute on Common Core Unit planning we were provided several learning opportunities to better understand and apply Norman Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |